Sony Buyer

8 Responses to “New Sony Alpha digital SLR cameras: PMA 2008 show report”

1. June 10th, 2009 at 1:13 am

   

   jailbreaker12334332 says:
   
   

   sony a300k is way …
   sony a300k is way better, its a step up from amuature dslrs like nikon d40 etc. its more of a experianced photography camera.

2. June 10th, 2009 at 1:13 am

   

   kayaliphu says:
   
   

   my question is …
   my question is Canon EOS Rebel XS 10.1 MP VS Sony Alpha A300K, Which one should i choose? Thanks.

3. June 10th, 2009 at 1:13 am

   

   Fighter303 says:
   
   

   I got the 350, but …
   I got the 350, but why is the 300 only available at jessops?

4. June 10th, 2009 at 1:13 am

   

   ghvh23 says:
   
   

   Totaly agree just …
   Totaly agree just got the sony a300. it is realy good and i have taken some fantastic pictures!! The 300 can take 3 fps were the 350 has 2.5 fps! get the 300!!!

5. June 10th, 2009 at 1:13 am

   

   A4rule says:
   
   

   The Alpha 300 is a …
   The Alpha 300 is a fantastic camera. The fold out screen is very useful and image quality is second to none. 14mp is no needed!!! In the UK it’s only available through Jessops and they were very helpful.

6. June 10th, 2009 at 1:13 am

   

   sonicstep says:
   
   

   Lots of features, …
   Lots of features, but what about maintenance? In particular where is the ‘main’ backup memory battery held and how accessible is it?

   Will it be necessary to send the body to an authorised Sony service/repair agent at ‘cost’ to get it replaced in three or so years time?

7. June 10th, 2009 at 1:13 am

   

   Schnully6 says:
   
   

   Thats why i bought …
   Thats why i bought a A300.
   Normal Holiday Picture maker falling into the Pixel Mad (sorry about ma bad English ;o) ).
   Sometimes is les more.

8. June 10th, 2009 at 1:13 am

   

   ftpaddict says:
   
   

   14 MP on a CCD …
   14 MP on a CCD sensor is a tad too much.