Sony Buyer

25 Responses to “Sony Alpha 700 camera review by What Digital Camera magazine”

1. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

   

   someguy6481 says:
   
   

   when the a800 or …
   when the a800 or a750 does come out it I hope it solves the ISO issues the a700 had before the firmware V4 update and improves on them, a next generation of the Boinz processor is needed.

2. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

   

   revowithin says:
   
   

   i know a900 out, …
   i know a900 out, but too expensive for me. i expecting something like a700…cuz theres been rumor new one coming soon

3. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

   

   kezamizogabi says:
   
   

   alpha 900 was out …
   alpha 900 was out ages ago.£1900 in uk):

4. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

   

   revowithin says:
   
   

   any idea when the …
   any idea when the newer alpha coming out ? a800 ? a750 ?

5. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

   

   valsero25 says:
   
   

   so thanks i am …
   so thanks i am going to convert it on website into my currency thanks for the information but do you if ican buy it from africa whee i am

6. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

   

   addsf1 says:
   
   

   when i bought my …
   when i bought my D300 it cost me just short of £1200 just for the body but now they are around £750 to £900 used but a great tip would be to go to an Ebay shop for a new one you can get some real good deals from there

7. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

   

   valsero25 says:
   
   

   guy if someone fhas …
   guy if someone fhas a nikon D70S just tell me about the price new or after use one

8. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

   

   valsero25 says:
   
   

   that d300 cost how …
   that d300 cost how much? you say it has live view ?

9. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

   

   valsero25 says:
   
   

   how much do alpha …
   how much do alpha 700 cost with the lens you us in the video it it 28–80mm i want to know fastly i really need a camera

10. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    

    valsero25 says:
    
    

    how much does that …
    how much does that cost you boy with the lenses pleaze it’s important to me

11. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    

    thomasward00 says:
    
    

    Since the Version 4 …
    Since the Version 4 firmware update for the A700, it more than matches the D300 in RAW performance, they do share the same sensor after all.

12. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    

    n40798 says:
    
    

    Thanks
    Thanks

13. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    

    shmeldrick says:
    
    

    HEy n40798, I have …
    HEy n40798, I have an a100 and I find the super steady shot very good but the only downside is if you’re using a heavy lens there’s no in-viewfinder-I.S.

14. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    

    silentalexx says:
    
    

    omfg!!! haha just …
    omfg!!! haha just hilarious

15. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    

    WhatDigitalCamera says:
    
    

    Good choice. We did …
    Good choice. We did a group test of the D300, Alpha 700 and Olympus E3 recently (the Canon 40D is not in the same price bracket) and the D300 comfortably won, though they’re all excellent and have their own special qualities.

16. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    

    addsf1 says:
    
    

    I found this review …
    I found this review very informative and thank you for posting it. I have been all over the place deciding what camera to buy the 40D, D300 or the Alfa 700. After watching yuor reviews on all three cameras i have decided to go with the D300 mainly down to 1)live view mode 2)the 51 point focus 3)the 12Mp 4)HDMI out need i go on. I can’t take anything away from the other two and think that it is down to the user to decide what is best for them! enjoy it what ever you get

17. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    

    licokao says:
    
    

    I prefer in IS in …
    I prefer in IS in the body. Every lens becomes IS and less expensive. Unless you’re a pro I don’t think you can tell the difference

18. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    

    n40798 says:
    
    

    Are there any …
    Are there any down-sides about having the image stabilization in the camera instead of in the lense?

19. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    

    johnnyboy1997 says:
    
    

    anyone notice at 7: …
    anyone notice at 7:04 theres a book called “fetish girls”????:D

20. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    

    FieserBauer says:
    
    

    got this pearl of a …
    got this pearl of a dslr! i just love love it!
    u can get some excellent lenses for the sony/minolta mount!
    * * * * * !

21. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    

    simpson30 says:
    
    

    Time to upgrade …
    Time to upgrade from my a100 to the a700 soon I think.

22. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    

    N0rdman says:
    
    

    The Sony draws a …
    The Sony draws a lot of pedigree from its predecessor Konica Minolta and handles beautifully, best ergonomics in the market. Solid performance and remember; Sony and Konica Minolta all started making consumer products, not like Nikon that was originally into military optical instruments and later made third part lenses in 1935 for a company making copies of Leica cameras, that company was Canon. Go for Sony I say!

23. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    

    andyroo2540 says:
    
    

    i was deciding …
    i was deciding between the cannon 40d or the alpha 700 and this review has ured me that the alpha 700 is the better choice
    i’ll be getting the camera with the 162105 lens soon

24. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    

    Lord0fSteel says:
    
    

    Yeah, grat …
    Yeah, grat advertisment – where is the critique?

25. May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am

    

    golawola says:
    
    

    The SSS was …
    The SSS was mentioned around halfway through.